Some school require children(5-11岁) to work together instead of working on their own during most of their learning process， do you agree or disagree that is the best way to teach children？
I agree with young children, more specifically, primary school children, should work as a team to learn. Young children rely on having fun to study while teamwork builds up kids’ own relationships and personalities, these are beneficial for the children for their future studies and social skills.
Young children came to school with hearts full of curiosity. What teacher should do is not only delivering the knowledge to these new burn lamb, but also make the teaching process more attracting to them. As the teacher team up a group of students, they would make the study more fun such as having a little discussing time on the lesson they just learned, or having fun by doing projects and daily assignments together. This process is very important for kids when they are absorbing new context they had never known about. When I was in primary school, my literature teacher would put four desks together and let us have a face to face discussion on the article we just read about, and answer questions. All my teammates were trying to show how good their ideas are, I was not an exception for that. The more we team up, the more we learn, and also the closer we get to each other.
During primary school time, many people had struggled with how to make a friend. Kids were usually too shy to speak out their wish of making friends. Group work is an official chance for them. While they talking about the lecture or working on their projects, they also get to know each other well. Socialization at a young age help kids to build their own confidence in communicating with others when they grow up. Friends are also the motivation of coming to school and get good grades on their own academic performance, because their friends can bring them a sense of competing. When they grow up they can place themselves at a demonstrate position in their own works and families.
People might give an opposite opinion, such as kids can distract each other if they team up, but it seems to be superficial by concerning this problem. Learning to not be distracted is also a skill that can be obtained at teamwork. For example, if the project is due tomorrow, and what the kids had done was playing around only, and they would get a bad mark on it and might be punished by the teacher. After this, they would know how to be self-disciplined and accomplish the work efficiently.
Kids need to learn a lot of things at school, and teamwork can provide the most efficient and beneficial help to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ey grow up they can place themselves at a demonstrate position in their own works and familie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion in their own works and families. People might give an opposite opinion, s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and accomplish the work efficiently. Kids need to learn a lot of things at sc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for example, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65532879819 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57405074125 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8750644899 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7619047619 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217467583472 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719329417267 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604523535028 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130463308308 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825061615073 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.