Some school require children(5-11岁) to work together instead of working on their own during most of their learning process， do you agree or disagree that is the best way to teach children？
I agree with young children, more specifically, primary school children, should work as a team to learn. Young children rely on having fun to study while teamwork build up kids’ own relationships and personalities, these are beneficial for the children for their future studies and socialize.
Young children came to school with hearts full of curiosity. What teacher should do is not only delivering the knowledge to these new burn lamb, but also make the teaching process more attracting to them. As the teacher team up a group of students, they would make the study more fun such as having a little discussing time on the lesson they just learned, or have fun by doing projects and daily assignments together. This process is very important for kids when they are absorbing new context they never known about. When I was in primary school, my literature teacher would put four desks together and let us have a face to face discussion on the article we just read about, and answer questions. All my teammates were trying to show how good their ideas are, I was not an exception for that. As the more we team up, the more we learn, and also the close we get to each other.
During primary school time, many people had struggle with how to make a friend. Kids were usually to shy to speak out their wish of making friends. Group work is an official chance for them. While they talking about the lecture or working on their projects, they also get to know each other well. Socialization at young age help kids to build their own confidence of communicating with others when they grow up. Friends are also the motivation of coming to school and get good grades on their own academic performance, because their friends can bring them sense of competing. When them grow up they can place them self at a demonstrate position in their own works and families.
People might give an opposite opinion such as kids can distract each other if they team up, but it seem to be superficial by concerning this problem. Learn to not be distracted if also a skill that can be learned at teamwork. For example, if the project is due tomorrow, and what the kids had done was playing around only, and they would get bad mark on it and might be some little punishment from the teacher. After this, they would know how to be self-discipline and disturb the work efficiently.
Kids need to learn a lot of things at school, teamwork can provide most efficient and beneficial help to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hem grow up they can place them self at a demonstrate position in their own works and familie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion in their own works and families. People might give an opposite opinion su...
^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ract each other if they team up, but it seem to be superficial by concerning this pr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line and disturb the work efficiently. Kids need to learn a lot of things at sc...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... efficient and beneficial help to them.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for example, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64840182648 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53382694292 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509132420091 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3840812477 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9523809524 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228021438239 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741859096287 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587108842011 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134622397825 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078795240942 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.