Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Friends are an indespensible part of one's life and happiness. Most of people are capable of keeping long-term relationships with friends and other might be able to establish a good rapport with strangers in a relatively short amount of time. In terms of feeling happy, I think being able to keep a close relationship with a few people is more important than getting to know many new friends.
People with the ability to maintain long-term friendships are usually reliable. What characteristics are required to keep friendships? The obvious answers are patiance, passion. It can be deducted that one with all these qualities can have control of many things in her life, and they will be more happy.
One can gain a lot from long period friendships. "Rome doesn't built in one day", so as relationships. Only by investing time and energy in the relationship can one build trust. Plus, the long time two person knows each other , the more they understand each other. Imagine some kind of emergencies happened, what are the chances of asking help from a new aquaintance? Most people would choose to call a close friend.
Granted, the ability of making new friends easily may bring excitement and make one popular. However, in the long run, these new friends might turn to be strangers again if no further actions were taken. Moreover, some people doesn't show their real character or interests when they meet people for the first time. The first impression is not always reliable.
To sum up, if one can maintain friendships for a long period of time, she can not only benefit more from it, but also handle a lot of things in life. The ability required to keep a long-term relationship is much more complicated than simply making many new friends, as the former requires one to be persistant and considerable, while the latter only requires one to show their best side for a short period of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
Friends are an indespensible part of ones life and happiness. Most of people are ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...nsible part of ones life and happiness. Most of people are capable of keeping long-term relati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rom long period friendships. 'Rome doesnt built in one day', so as relations...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...ne build trust. Plus, the long time two person knows each other , the more they unders...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he long time two person knows each other , the more they understand each other. Im...
^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tions were taken. Moreover, some people doesnt show their real character or interests ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...one can maintain friendships for a long period of time, she can not only benefit more from it,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 400, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...one to show their best side for a short period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, i think, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88307692308 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7382330998 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541538461538 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8397312346 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5263157895 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1052631579 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28712906988 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863876560125 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752281203281 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172347387329 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417243125775 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.