Is is wise to say that video games are bad ? There are two schools of thoughts. One school answers the above question in affirmative where as the other school disagrees. According ,my point of view video games take part in increasing the interest in learning. There are two major reasons to support this thought firstly we will take a look at why games were developed initially and then we can see their effects on kids.
When video games were introduced firstly, they were designed to improve to IQ of the autistic child. The purpose of designing games was to help in growth and development of brain capacity of child. Later on the games were misused for entertainment purpose and games became addiction and we know that with addictions there are several side effects are present. Games help in releasing stress and increasing the capacity to concentrate like meditation.
Young students or kids from age 5 to 8 are incapable of sitting in one place their curiosity of learning new things is tremendous. Some psychologist say that this age is like wet soil we can shape as per our wish. By using video games we can teach them many new things faster than other methods of teaching for instance games related joining words and matching sounds of respective animals as well as joining names, words with colors, vegetables or animals. This electronic games can be played as many times we want whereas, the games made up of paper might get distorted after few use.
Some believe that teaching to play video games is waste of time because they have fear that this might alter into addiction and kids have sensitive eyes and playing games might affect their eyes. We need to remember that everything above limit is harmful so it is important to keep limits on playing games.
By considering all above school of thoughts that differed in its line of reasoning but first school of thought is also cogent enough to take into consideration so I strongly agree with the statement that games are helpful and they are not waste of time if we choose the right games. To stand for today's compitation we must teach kids by using better and improved ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
Is is wise to say that video games are bad ? ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...swers the above question in affirmative where as the other school disagrees. According ,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as the other school disagrees. According ,my point of view video games take part ...
^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er school disagrees. According ,my point of view video games take part in increas...
^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun use seems to be countable; consider using: 'few uses'.
Suggestion: few uses
...e up of paper might get distorted after few use. Some believe that teaching to play...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'playing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: playing
...few use. Some believe that teaching to play video games is waste of time because th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, then, well, whereas, as to, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76407506702 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44688638794 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55764075067 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0559876216 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.529411765 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204963272227 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063142284353 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338029770172 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104705561734 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363850577356 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.