Some students like to work in groups with other students when doing assignments and projects. Other students prefer to work independently. Which do you prefer?
Although, working independently help students to grow independent and cause to solve the problems by themselves, but, co-operation and working with others has some advantages that worth to work with others. Increase the sense of co-operation, help to solve the problem better and sooner and motivate students' creation of some of the reasons that I should refer to.
Working with others and try to do the projects by friend increase the sense of co-operation in the students. This specification help the student in two focal point of their life: job and daily life in the society. Practicing this skill makes students ready to working with others in job atmospheres. Also, to live with other people we all need to have the skill to communicate with others. Do projects in group increases the communication relations and improve this skill.
The second reason is that working in groups help students to solve the problems or do the projects better or sometimes sooner. When you divide your responsibilities, it takes you less, but the result is better. You will focus on a part of the project and do it in a better manner. Sometimes working in groups causes some student to get down of work. but, have a sight in large scale, the advantages are more.
Motivation the student's creation is the third aspect of working in groups. Working with other people encourage students to have creation. In fact, it provide a kind of health completion. Everyone in the group wants to make new suggestions and propose his/her own ideas.
By and large, even though, sometimes it is necessary for student s to do the projects and assignments individually, but, I prefer to work with others if it was possible. To be honest, my experience show that better results was gain when working with others. For me, improving the co-operation, saving the time and better result of the project and cause proper completion space to have new ideas are the least advantages of working in groups. When I can benefit from others and have a better results, why not?! Why solitude?!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
... students to grow independent and cause to solve the problems by themselves, but, co-ope...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ooner and motivate students creation of some of the reasons that I should refer to. Workin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'helps'.
Suggestion: helps
...ion in the students. This specification help the student in two focal point of their...
^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...auses some student to get down of work. but, have a sight in large scale, the advan...
^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e advantages are more. Motivation the students creation is the third aspect of working...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
... students to have creation. In fact, it provide a kind of health completion. Everyone i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third, in fact, kind of, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76363887443 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479885057471 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1368751766 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46255277678 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149264137463 0.076458572812 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111963324517 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271463318084 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205699781341 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.