Some universities expect the students to choose a major field of study when they enter the school; while other universities wait until the second or the third year before students deciding to choose a major field of study. Which do you prefer? Why or why not?
It is undeniable that the most controversial subject among students is the field in which students major. Some of the universities expect students to choose their field in the first year while some of the universities expect students to postpone it until the second or third year. Personally, I am of the opinion that the latter would be the best choice for students. I will pinpoint the point of view through two rational reasons in the following text.
The first reason to clarify my standpoint is that fresh students with different interests need more time to find their true calling. To be more specific, when a fresh student starts his/her studying in an area of science, choosing the field to major in is a big mistake since s/he is not an idea regards the new field s/he has just started to study. My own experience is a compelling example of this. My university forced me to determine my field of study in the first semester. I picked up architecture science since it was popular but after a year I figured out that it is not what I was thinking about so I had to change it. Consequently, I faced some problems with changing my field but I could manage them. Eventually, I change it to environmental design which has different approaches and matches my dream field of study. Had my university never forced me to choose my field at the beginning, I would not have faced those issues. As a result, it is vital for students to take their time then choose their field to major in.
The second reason to illustrate my outlook is that students in the second year are armed with more knowledge, thereby They would be able to pick up their field in terms of their future career. Actually, a student in the second year dramatically knows the rope more than a fresh student. The student has gotten a wider attitude toward which field of study can help him/her with a wide range of options to get a job in the future. Back to my experience of changing my field as an example again, I changed it because as an environmental designer after my graduation, I would get a job in a wide variety of different fields. Whereas, as an architecture, I had a little chance to find a job like my friend who was my classmate at first. After three years of seeking a job related to his field of study, he still is jobless. Had I never changed my field If study due to its future career, I could not have majored in a field with lots of chances to take a job.
In a nutshell, it is my confirmed conviction that picking up a field to major, for a student it is further better to choose it in the second year because the time that a student needs to take to find a field of study in which the student interests. Besides, students in the second year because of the knowledge they have acquired are more capable of choosing a better field to major in the aspect of the future career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...s is the field in which students major. Some of the universities expect students to choose ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ose their field in the first year while some of the universities expect students to postpon...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, consequently, first, if, look, second, so, still, then, third, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42424242424 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58565111966 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420454545455 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8278026543 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358544039739 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124843010973 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115156158784 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288386592925 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846748296064 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.