Some young adults prefer to live independently, while some continue to live with their parents? Which do you support.
Generally speaking, it is better for young adults to continue living with their parents rather than living independently without parental support. My viewpoint will be substantiated in forthcoming paragraphs emphasizing on two salient reasons.
First, it is beneficial from financial point of view. Parents have already gone through a lot of financial difficulties and they exactly know how to manage money properly. On top of that, these days it is very expensive to rent a house, buy a car or fulfill our living cost in general. So, when young people live with their parents, they will be supported financially. By the way of example, I vividly remember how grueling it was for me to manage my finances when I tried to live independently during my undergraduate study. On one side, I had to pay my college fees and also manage all school supplies, on other hand; I had to spend money on food. For this, I even lived on cramped apartment and sometimes I skipped my meals as well. Had I lived with my parents, I would have been supported financially whenever I had difficulties.
Second, living with parents is also beneficial as they will guide us in proper decision making process during dilemma, particularly when young people try to decide their career paths. Parents are the ones who know us our entire life. They know our interests, hobbies and our capabilities. In this sense, trying to decide our future career without parental guidelines drives me crazy. For example, after finishing high school, my sister had a great dilemma. She was confused whether to pursue undergraduate study or go for vocational training. Though it is a dream of everyone to get a job early, that may cost us in future without proper education. Realizing the fact that the world is competitive, my parents urged her to study rather than going for vocational training. Now, she has established herself in a big multinational company. Had she decided to go for short term vocational training she might not be where she is today and our parents played a great role in this regard as well. So, it is better to live with parents as they can guide us during hard times.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments maintained, I’m of the opinion that young individuals should stay with their parents. This is mainly because it is important to consider finances and also helps young people in proper decision making during difficult situations.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Telling the truth is always the most important consideration in any relationship. 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people enjoy life more than old people do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, well, as for, for example, in general, by the way, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79448888658 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52784503632 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8180657969 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2608695652 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215150232071 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658669345001 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926841768983 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1624797963 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848135433796 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.