It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and radically progressive era in which we live, all human beings have always been involved in a great struggle to improve the level of creativity and knowledge by watching movies or reading books. Whereas some people debate that for the case when a movie is made based on a specific story in a book, it would be better for all individuals to watch the movie before reading the book, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that this is not a great idea and it is more important to read the book before watching the movie. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be perspicuously substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, no one casts a shadow of doubt on the fact that if a person watches a movie, which has been made based on the story of a well-known book, before reading the book, he will definitely know how the end of the book is. However, he will not sure about how different factors have exactly affected the formation of the story. In other words, a movie does not cover all aspects of a book due to its short length in comparison to the book’s length. Consequently, one of the most exquisite and momentous points of reading a book before watching its movie is that spectators can easily comprehend and follow the structures of the movie. An example can significantly shed some light on this subject. Several years ago, I decided to watch the series of Harry Potter movie. In the end, I realized that if I did not read its book before watching the movies, I would have not been able to completely understand the role of some characters in the story. The book strikingly helped me recognize some points related to the characters of that series.
Moreover, one of the most paramount and delight points of watching a movie is that the attitude of the director is really involved in his movie. Under such a circumstance, if an individual does not read the book before watching the movie, the opinion of the director absolutely impact on his perspective toward the movie. Therefore, people cannot discuss their own imagination, consequences as well as assumptions about the characters of the story. An example can drive this notion dramatically home. In the aforementioned example, I actually sure that if I did not read the story at first, I would have not enabled to talk about Harry’s characteristic individually. This is because the actors attempted to show his character very kind and enthusiastic person; however, he was definitely an ardent and non-eager person.
In conclusion, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that a person should read a book before watching its movie on television. This is because he can either talk about his own attitude readily without any effects from the actor’s standpoint on it or he will be able to figure out the movie point by point.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81538461538 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86543365988 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465384615385 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6748862394 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388181531826 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112539353835 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108475794378 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246161802202 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973818519479 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.002688172 275% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.