Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by the person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by the person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
Nowadays, each project needs a professional team and nobody can deny how much an unbreakable team can effect on project. In such groups interactions between people play a vital role. By that, and as the issue mentioned above, some groups will be helped more by a person who listen to the group members’ desire. While, some groups are more successful by a person who insists on things that should be done. I concur with the former one because of two main reason that will discuss in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, if a person in group discusses about team’s inclinations, the group will explore more ways and will have a better chance to success. It’s crystal clear that in such a group every person tries his/her best to suggests a way which help the team to defeat the challenge. Thus, in this situation, such a person who listens to other group members’ willingness, gathers all the ideas and then can chooses what is best for the project. I had a personal experience working in such groups and every time the group encountered with a problem all members gathered in a room and the manager wanted that everybody suggest a way to solve the problem. Then, he wrote all ideas in a board and after that discuss about them. At last, he picked the best way.
Moreover, when team members see that their ideas can effect on project, they encourage to be more efficient. In these groups, which a person listens to people, everybody want to come up with the best ideas. This means that, these groups are more competitive than a group which a person calls off the final decision without seeking for a simple help. For example, as I mentioned in previous paragraph, I worked in such a group. In that time, every night and day, every person read a lot of book and surfed the net to enhance their knowledge. So, in the meeting he/she can share what he/she learn about the subject with team.
In sum, I discussed about an important subject about team works and team interactions on projects in previous paragraph especially about a substantial role of a person who will be willing to do what other group members want. This person not only effect on the project success, but also encourage other team members to be more competent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sten to the group members' desire. While, some groups are more successful by a p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'choose'
Suggestion: choose
...ess, gathers all the ideas and then can chooses what is best for the project. I had a p...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 481, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun book seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of books'.
Suggestion: a lot of books
... every night and day, every person read a lot of book and surfed the net to enhance their kno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 590, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'learns'.
Suggestion: learns
...he meeting he/she can share what he/she learn about the subject with team. In su...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 247, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...roup members want. This person not only effect on the project success, but also encour...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73670886076 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53653957342 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503797468354 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5835561205 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4736842105 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443605087595 0.236089414692 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143008214452 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112241799645 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310149378295 0.150856017488 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630586703652 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.