Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
Nowadays watching movies and reading books are two major entertainments that everybody has. Some people prefer to spend their free time watching screens, while others enjoy to create the story of book inside their imagination. But, as the writer of view mentioned, some people prefer to watch movies first and then read the original story, whereas a group of people prefer the opposite. I like the second group rather to read the original story first and then watch the movie. In the following paragraph I explain the reasons.
Firstly, not only human imaginations are more powerful than cameras, but also they are less limited than the movie’s budget. Imaginations can construct the plan of the story exactly what it look like. On the flip side, cameras are limited to three dimensional world. As a result, your mind can live in the story. Besides, most of the movies are suffering from limited budget. Because of this point, they can built some finite plans. They also remove some characters due to limitary budget. For example, if you watched “Pride and Prejudice” movie, you would understand my points clearly. In that movie some characters of the story have been removed.
Moreover, if you read a story book at the first place, you will have a better understanding of events. The writers always try to show how their characters behave in different situation. So, when readers read the book, they know how the specific character behave. These means that they get the story very well. On the other hand, in this field, movies are weaker than stories due to time limitation. Studies have shown that people in North America prefer to read “Me Before You” the book instead of watching “Me Before You” the movie because in that book character’s behaviors form very well and based on this feature, readers can establish a better connection with the story.
In sum, I mentioned two reasons why people want to read books instead of watching them first. They maybe want to create plans and characteristic in their imaginations or maybe they tired to watch movies which suffer from budget limitation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoy creating'.
Suggestion: enjoy creating
...ree time watching screens, while others enjoy to create the story of book inside their imaginat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'looks'?
Suggestion: looks
...t the plan of the story exactly what it look like. On the flip side, cameras are lim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'build'
Suggestion: build
...budget. Because of this point, they can built some finite plans. They also remove som...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, whereas, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06214689266 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59498604388 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8136587912 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4545454545 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422613309968 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105939527226 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946564979709 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261644426618 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108225916802 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.