Students do reading by their own personality is as important as, or more important
than reading assigned by teachers.
In this day and age, adults tend to spend less time on books and more time on their work or study because of the rapid pace of modern life. However, everyone still attach great importance on students' reading for their betterment. Recently, a hot debate arises: whether or not it is better for students to read books that interest them then to only read those assigned as homework. Although the majority of people holds the former idea, I think there is nothing more critical than choosing books themselves for the following reasons.
First and foremost, students can benefitied enormously from reading books that fit their personality, since they are more likely to concentrate on the contents and therefore read even more. As is known to all, we all have the tendency to focus on something we really enjoy, instead of being requested to do some tasks like reading assigned books. Choosing books that parallel with one's personality means we can be more emotionally immersed while reading, which will ultimately lead us to the world described in the book. It is not har to imagine what a bad experience it would be if a introverted, speakless student had to push himself into a noisy context as his teacher asked him to, which is only a waste of energy and time.
Another point worth mentioning is the more a book fit a student, the deeper he can truely truly understand the book, and thus looking forward to reading ever more books. To state it more concisely, regarding our personality as a standard of choosing books is the core factor of finding common grounds between a reader and the book. My friend, Jack, is a good case in point. Jack is allowed to read whatever he likes, so he can finish reading almost 10 books a semester. He always has the enthusiasm as well as motivation to continue, since the book that fit to his personality can strike an echo in his heart, feeling reading even more enjoyable.
Admittedly, teachers can assign books according to the material they impart in class, and hence does well in recommending books to enhance students learning skills. Nonetheless, nothing can ever compare the joy interest provides. To put it into a nutshell, I cannot emphasize the necessity of reading books based on one's personality more due to the above statements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...terment. Recently, a hot debate arises: whether or not it is better for students to read books...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ooks. Choosing books that parallel with ones personality means we can be more emotio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ne what a bad experience it would be if a introverted, speakless student had to p...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, really, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82442748092 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.615996367 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582697201018 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4932842545 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5625 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335900842318 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108495006934 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786295327111 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203810547325 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511172616094 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.