Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students do reading by their own personality is as important as, or more important than reading assigned by teachers
As technology develops and ideas about learning change, there are several opinions about whether it should be mandatory for students to assigned study material by teachers. Some people believe that students should have their own favorite style of reading textbooks, while others believe that students should only follow teachers ’ attitudes about reading. I think that students need to have their own reading style, which helps them to ensure a more prosperous life.
First of all, students achieve a more creative mind, which helps them after graduation to find their path. Teachers should indeed determine obligations for students, but students need to have their own style when reading their studies materials. Students having their own reading style could learn how to manage their school stuff to get good grades. Therefore, teachers compelling students to do their studies based on their method could diminish their intelligence and creativity. Creativity is a crucial factor that students should improve, which helps them to have bright ideas about their schedules in their life. An experienced teacher could improve students’ ability when let them find their own reading style. This method will help students in all aspects of their lives because their minds learn how to manage their issues based on their creative path matching their own personality. Creative students will have program-solving skills and lead them to get along with problems in their lives. Program solving ability helps them to pass difficulties and obstacles during their lives.
Secondly, students have more eager to learn new things during their education. Teachers should train their students with modern teaching methods to improve their abilities and skills in different aspects. Therefore, an expert teacher should help their students to find their favorite reading style based on their personality. For example, some teachers try to dedicate just the determined reading material to students and compel them to read. As a result, students will be bored and achieve merely a superficial understanding of the assigned topics. If sometimes students choose their own favorite reading material, they will eager to continue their education. Eager students could stay focused on their studies, which helps them to get good grades. Not only that, but students could achieve more comprehension of their textbooks, and that helps them to find a good job after their graduation in a prestigious firm.
In conclusion, teachers should let students find their way based on their personality to learn how to find their path during their education and after that. Moreover, students could find a creative mind, which helps them to achieve program-solving skills to face a dilemma in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should have their own favorite style of reading textbooks, while others believe ...
^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them to ensure a more prosperous life. First of all, students achieve a more cr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2347.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42032332564 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55598629493 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424942263279 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1094046318 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.681818182 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285621095346 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124027878956 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547317352363 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208575863657 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494374512348 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.