The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Friendship is an element that is set to have great influences on our lives due to the amount of time we spend with our friends. A debate surrounding the issue whether maintaining a small group of friends over a long period of time is playing a significant role for our happiness than a large number of them has witnessed many controversies. Some people think that there is no connection between the numbers of friends with our joyfulness. On the other extreme of the rope, others assume that more friends mean more fun. I, for one, subscribe to the first opinion and strongly believe that the quality of friendship is what makes it valuable. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my view point.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that human is per se sociable. In other words, it is in our instinct that we like to spend our time with our friends, those who have same interests and concerns as us since we assume that they understand us more than our family members. It goes without saying that with the galloping rate of technology making connection with people becomes so easy since our lives are mostly surrounded by internet and its colorful apps. However, the main point is how profound these relationships are. In fact, our visual friends are not thrust worthy enough to share our secrets and fears with them since they are not sincere. Statics have shown that a high portion of teenagers are betrayed and used because of their wrong perception about their internet friends.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above happiness is an issue that is connected with the value of people around us. As a matter of fact, when there are friends who we can rely on we become truly satisfy with our friendships. It is crystal clear that the smaller the number of friends the more valuable they are. In contrast, someone who is able to make many friends cannot make genuine and profound connection since she/he does not spare real time with them. Another positive ramification resulting from deep friendship is that no matter how hard life will become we are sure that there is someone we can lean in.
All in all, a meticulous look over what have been discussed reveals the fact that maintaining a deep friendship is what we can get by having long life friends, those who makes us really happy with their existence.
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 76
- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students do reading by their own personality is as important as or more important than reading assigned by teachers 73
- To be successful businesses must spend a lot of money on advertising put more money into advertising 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed in study or job the ability to adjust or adapt to changing conduction or circumstance is more important than having knowledge 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME
Message: Use simply 'period'.
...ng a small group of friends over a long period of time is playing a significant role for our h...
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...significant role for our happiness than a large number of them has witnessed many controversies. ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, really, so, in contrast, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73838630807 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49655162369 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518337408313 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2299340992 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269812797507 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853673487791 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769042736615 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181979932152 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901263098307 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.