Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they
oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading article state that alturstic atc exists amoung human and animals. It is proved that with 2 example. However, the lecture disagree with these definition and give opposite example which is given in reading article.
Firstly, according to the reading metariel human can act in unselfish behavior with other people. And it illustrates that with donation organs for strange people and share their food with them, but the lecture believe that people can not think others and they usually act in selfish way. The professor gives example that people can donation their example but it is only related with strange society which is mean that people know always is appluased by other strange people. In this reason despite people could share thier foods with other and donated thier organs with others, these acts can not provide people are unselfish to the professor.
Secondly, the reading article gives that an animal example. This example shows that involved meerkats behaviour when they are hunting. When Meerkats are eating the one of them observers a predict to other, this means a meerkat does not eat while other had full of stomach. This meerkat if there is a dangerous station for other meerkats, it will give signal for others. However, according to the lecture it is not true example fot unselfish acting beacuse if there is a dangerous circumstance a meerkat is espace which is has responsible to give signal for other. Besides other meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose.
In the conlusion, even the reading article defend that animal and human are unselfish avaliables. The lecture provide that it is not true with two examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this definition' or 'these definitions'?
Suggestion: this definition; these definitions
...ple. However, the lecture disagree with these definition and give opposite example which is give...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'meerkats'' or 'meerkat's'?
Suggestion: meerkats'; meerkat's
...ample. This example shows that involved meerkats behaviour when they are hunting. When M...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ts are eating the one of them observers a predict to other, this means a meerkat does not...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...ides other meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never car...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...r meerkats never stay to after the they has full of stomach. And they never care of...
^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...ey never care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose. In th...
^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'meat'.
Suggestion: meat
...ever care of a meerkat which is not eat a meat for observation purpose. In the conlu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...n are unselfish avaliables. The lecture provide that it is not true with two examples.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95578231293 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34866593255 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465986394558 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6115772149 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0625 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 11.8709677419 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0237534188223 0.236089414692 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0125180450571 0.076458572812 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0187546657485 0.0737576698707 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0238676436219 0.150856017488 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161591286081 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.