Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

The reading state that dinosaurs and other predetors did not an active hunter. However, on the contrast the lecture defend that dinosaurs and any other predetors could be able to hunting like a predetors which are living nowadays in the world. There are three different point in the lecture which is opposide with the reading metarial.
Firstly, the reading believe that most mammals has small size and they did not manage to hunting big animals before 150 millon years ago. It gives example full grown dinosaurs to support that claim. But the lecture gives that opposide example than reading. According to the lecture these dinosaurs were not grown they were only baby dinosaurs. Moreover, adult dinosaurs had great stomach to eaten large piece of other animals.
Secondly, the reading defend to R.robustus had very small legs in these they could not chase their prey and this is another reason why dinosaurs was not be able to hunter. However, the lecture explain that situation with a example. This example related with Tasmanian Devil. This animal had small leg but it is not mean it could not chase prey beacuse even it had small leg, it could running approximately 50 km per hours. In this reason the lecture said that dinosaurs great hunter, even they had small legs.
Thirdly, the reading tried to define the dinosaurs could not hunter with their stomach. According to reading there was a evidence preys' bones or teeth but the reading claims there is no evidence like that. On the contrast, the lecture explain it with dinasour stomach beacuse they had huge stomach and they can eaten a prey as a one piece and in this reason there is could not be found any evidence but it does not mean a dinasour was not hunter.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2020-01-05 itzavid 80 Read full essay
2018-11-21 Fenny 3 Read full essay

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imals. Secondly, the reading defend to R.robustus had very small legs in these ...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...is another reason why dinosaurs was not be able to hunter. However, the lecture ex...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the lecture explain that situation with a example. This example related with Tasm...
^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'run'
Suggestion: run
...beacuse even it had small leg, it could running approximately 50 km per hours. In this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with their stomach. According to reading there was a evidence preys bones or teet...
^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tomach. According to reading there was a evidence preys bones or teeth but the r...
^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'eat' or 'be eaten'?
Suggestion: eat; be eaten
...cuse they had huge stomach and they can eaten a prey as a one piece and in this reaso...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...as a one piece and in this reason there is could not be found any evidence but it ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79194630872 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21986396998 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456375838926 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2492377992 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0764742022568 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334607720731 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327867375749 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050895783831 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022924981763 0.0443174109184 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.42419426049 82% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.