Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

Some may agree that technology makes children less active. I, however, disagree with the author's argument. Technology has always been good to either children or adult.

To begin with the technology has assisted the children in education. My 5 year old nephew, who is studying in kinder-garden can fluently speak in English just by seeing the videos on YouTube. He also has a exceptional communication skills than other children on the class who are not very used to with mobile phones and technology. Moreover, the technology has assisted the children for the fast learning. For example, the children on the remote area of Nepal like Rolpa these days are able to get good grades on the secondary level conducted by national education board just by getting the online class through the medium of internet. Those children used to have the poor grades on the secondary level, as a result they were not able to compete with the city children. However, the scenario has been changed with the technology. Other things remaining same, only with the advancement of technology they are able to compete on the national level competition.

Secondly, technology has provided the access to children to built their art and skills. For example, the children are able to see the different kinds of dance and songs with the help of television. So, child from Nepal can practice the dancing steps performed on Italy. Not only this, the students from rural parts of country like Nepal are aware of the global challenges like climate change. Bindu Bhandari, one of the junior student in Nepal was selected from Nepal to speak about the climate change in the US. This is all with the advancement of the technology.

Some may argue that technology have actually made the children lazy by stating that they are these days indulged on the online games like PUBG, mobile games instead of outdoor games. To state this mean to neglect the whole positiveness that technology have helped children to be more active. One has to judge what population of the children are actually being less creative after being indulged on the games, social media and other technological things.

Thus, above all clearly states that technology have helped children to be active more than in past without the use of technology.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2020-01-05 itzavid 80 Read full essay
2018-11-21 Fenny 3 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
Some may agree that technology makes children less act...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s active. I, however, disagree with the authors argument. Technology has always been go...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eing the videos on YouTube. He also has a exceptional communication skills than o...
^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ancement of the technology. Some may argue that technology have actually made the ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 30.3222958057 228% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98433420366 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54501832154 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501305483029 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1204181521 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9047619048 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289671401274 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910142892392 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619290602353 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166308093967 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642230846947 0.0443174109184 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.