teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past
Since the dawn of civilization, education has been playing a crucial role in the people's lives. In addition, no one can neglect the fact that teachers are the cornerstone of the educational process, and appreciating them can optimize the entire process of learning in school years. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among individuals whether teachers are less appreciated and valued by the society less more than before or not. Some people may hold the view that people cherish teachers more than in the past, while, some others take an opposite viewpoint. I personally contend that teachers are less appreciated than before. In the following, I will elaborate upon my standpoint through two reasonable pieces of evidence.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that increasing means of learning to put a threat on the value on teachers. It is generally agreed that the technological devices and types of equipment are developing at a galloping rate. Additionally, developing these technological devices like smartphones, laptops, and tablets, to name but a few pave the way for learning and informing much feasible than before. People who live nowadays have the opportunity to learn with the help of these devices. Moreover, Accessing to high-speed internet not only enables doors for grasping new materials but also opens doors for recognizing teacher’s faults and mistakes that can hit the value and status of them. Take a personal experience as an example. When I studied in high school, I used to take an online course with a native speaker for fostering my English skills. Thus, I had broad knowledge in this area. But someday my English teacher pronounced the pronunciation of the world 'circumstance' wrongly. I attempted to correct him but he neglects me. Consequently, the next day I rebut his pronunciation by applying a long man dictionary that leads to his excitement.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the economic well-being of families has developed thanks to industrialization. With this in mind, people are more inclined to have children with high literacy. Therefore, the quantity of teachers has increased. Increasing the number of teachers who teach students not only spoil the quality of them, but also make them less valuable than before. According to a recent study that has been published by Time magazine, the efficiency of teachers teaching these days are dropped. Moreover, statistics show that the people who are knowledgeable are more cherished by their audiences. As a consequent, No one cast doubt on this argument that the fewer teachers are knowledgeable, the less they would be cherished and valued.
In brief, one can logically draw the conclusion that teachers who live nowadays are less appreciated and values compared to the past due to the developing technological devices that enable people to learn by themselves and increasing the quantity that results in decreasing the quality of teachers has spoiled the value of them. However, there are other reasons and examples, challenging these reasons, not mentioned above. All in all, it is highly recommended that a survey can assess the validity of this argument accurately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less much'?
Suggestion: less much
...s appreciated and valued by the society less more than before or not. Some people may hol...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2707.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23597678917 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00465115641 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533849129594 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 844.2 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5170651484 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.259259259 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1481481481 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273616860379 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665967947845 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100728579714 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184998160456 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941800315393 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.