Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
It is indisputable fact that teachers play a crucial role in the educational aspect of an individual's life and consider as one of the most notable contributing factors to the attitude and behavior formation in students. In this regard, some people approve of this idea that stating political or social standpoint by teacher is harmful to students and should be avoided in the classroom. However, others hold the opposite point of view that is beneficial for students to become familiar with their teacher viewpoint in a variety of subjects. Personally, I concur with the idea that teachers should abstain from maintaining their political or social views in the classroom. I substantiate my standpoint as follows.
To commence with, students especially at younger ages, which are not mature enough in order to distinguish between harmful or innocuous information they absorb, consider their teacher as a role model and incline to follow their teacher attitude which could be precarious to their intellectual ability. It is crystal clear that students are remarkably affected by their parents and their mentor with respect to their attitude and behaviors culminate to form or change children's personalities and mindsets as time courses. In this vein of thought, should students be exposed to the social or political standpoint of their teacher in the classroom, they will tend to adapt their view and become narrow-minded and dogmatic people as a result. Therefore, knowing a certain point of view in political or social fields lead to the prevention of expanding student horizons and deprive students of developing their intellectual and interpersonal ability.
The second worth-mentioning reason comes to my mind is that should teacher assert their beliefs in the social or political realm in the classroom, this will plant the seed of conflict. To delineate, knowing and following teacher's vantage view in non-academic issues give rise to the student have prejudice in given social or political standpoint and contemplate other opinions invalid and false which could have result in serious controversy with other in term of communication with other people. By the way of illustration, my young brother during their elementary school, had a teacher with a racist social standpoint which had a profound effect on my brother's mindset and causes inappropriate behaviors with his immigrant friend in school. Consequently, teachers should avoid representing their opinions in other fields than the academic and educational field in order to avert harmful behavior and contentious.
To draw a conclusion, it is not advantageous for teachers to assert their political and social views in the classroom. According to their profound impact on students, Not only this could result in aggressive behavior with opposite viewpoint, but it also has an adverse effect on intellectual abilities and lead to become a narrow-minded person in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...al role in the educational aspect of an individuals life and consider as one of the most no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ct. To delineate, knowing and following teachers vantage view in non-academic issues giv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, as a result, by the way, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2484.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38828633406 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02071778034 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46420824295 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4861631909 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.6 100.406767564 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7333333333 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465214546634 0.236089414692 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196246115813 0.076458572812 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134104380997 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328399920286 0.150856017488 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788434130432 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 11.7677419355 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.