Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is an indisputable fact that accomplishing the vast majority of tasks and assignments takes place in groups, which need a versatile leader to direct group members toward achieving an optimal outcome in today's hectic life. In this regard, some people approve of this idea that leadership is an intrinsic knock, and it is implausible to obtain its quality through training. Others hold the opposite point of view. Personally, I concur with the latter group for a couple of reasons, substantiating as follows.
To commence with, having remarkable communication and interpersonal skill consider as one of the essential requirements for leadership, achieving through adequate experience in real life. To elucidate this point, the infrastructure of teamwork to obtain desirable results is the constructive and efficient connection between team members. Taking this into consideration, the group leader should have high-level interpersonal skills and an in-depth ability to establish effective communication and resolve controversies in the team in order to teach these competencies to group members. It is crystal clear that not only these valuable experience in human relationships are not in-born talent, but it also acquires by the score of connection with people in life span. Thus, the seed of being successful is planted in a vast number of real-world communication.
To second worth mentioning reason that comes to my mind is that sufficient knowledge and experience in related filed that the group have concentrated on is mandatory for the team leader. To delineate, in the recent era, issues have become more intricate and sophisticated. Accordingly, guiding group members on the correct path to accomplishing an assignment and achieving an optimum outcome with the minimum risk of failure, need profound knowledge and past exposure to predicament are pertaining to a given field of group activity. In this line of thought, an academic degree and real-world experience are mandatory for leadership that obtain through several years of studying in an academic environment and working in a pragmatic job market. As a result, the more robust leadership competencies, the higher the education level and the more real-life experience.
To draw a conclusion. I strongly advocate the notion that leadership quality could be learned and improved and is not inherent talent. This is because, Not only do leaders need high-level interpersonal skills, which gains by a plethora of connections with human-beings in real life, but they also should have in-depth academic knowledge and practical experience in a group field of activity. As a result, none of these competencies come up naturally.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, second, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45803357314 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19347755822 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52757793765 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9560369903 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107356705675 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349541448043 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315471073467 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756086202239 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358172190603 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.