TPO47 task1
the main idea of both the passage and lecture is about the possibility of the flying ability of a large ancient group of reptiles named Pteroasurs that lived juxtapose with dinosaurs and have wingspan. In this respect, the reading passage provides three major ideas. However, the lecture finds all the idea implausible and present some evidence to refute them.
First, the author argues that Pterosaurs likewise the ancient reptile was cold-blooded animals that were not capable of power flight since they have low-pace metabolism giving rise to provide inadequate energy for flying, On the contrary, the professor highlights the fact that recent fossil records have revealed that the Pterosaurs had dense hair fair covered body like warm-blooded animals. This feature which has seen in warm-blooded animal, allows them to keep body temperature high enough in extremely cold external temperature in order to produce sufficient energy that their metabolism needed for powered flight.
Second, the reading holds the standpoint that Pterosaurs' large body size confined their ability to being float in the sky owing to the reason that their weight was beyond their tolerability for maintaining in the air by flapping wings. conversely, the lecture dismisses the point due to the fact that the Pterosaurs unique anatomic evidence indicated that they had lightweight. Indeed, their bone is more prose with a plethora of hollow in comparison with other animals' solid bones which reduces their body weight significantly. Accordingly, despite their large dimension, low body weight provides the opportunity of keeping airborne for a long time via flapping wings.
Finally, the passage asserts that on the ground of weak and small leg muscle, Pterosaurs were unable to take off from the surface and launch into the air. In contrast, there were differences in harnessing limbs between other animals including birds and Pterosaurs. To delineate, birds take off from the ground with two legs, however, Pterosaurs utilized all 4 limbs in order to push up the ground and by doing so, they were capable of running fast and jump high to fly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the main idea of both the passage and lectu...
^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
...intaining in the air by flapping wings. conversely, the lecture dismisses the point due to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, conversely, finally, first, however, if, likewise, second, so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25525525526 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59721394865 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57957957958 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.2528788829 48.9658058833 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.