Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
It is indisputable fact that teachers play a crucial role in the educational aspect of an individual's life and consider as one of the most notable contributing factors to the attitude and behavior formation in students. In this regard, some people approve of this idea that stating a political or social standpoint by the teacher is harmful to students and should be avoided in the classroom. However, others hold the opposite point of view that is beneficial for students to become familiar with their teacher viewpoint in a variety of subjects. Personally, I concur with the idea that teachers should abstain from maintaining their political or social views in the classroom. I substantiate my standpoint as follows.
To commence with, Should teachers asserting their non-academic points of view in the classroom, this will break student's concentration on educational concerns. To put in a more vivid picture, the staple responsibility of teachers is to provide an environment that students can easily focus on their lessons and academic assignment without a distraction. In this vein, teachers should dedicate all their time in the classroom to teach syllabus according to the given curriculum and train students to be an excel expert in their research and academic field, into the bargain. Therefore, should teachers distract student's attention by maintaining political or social debate, this will affect the academic performance of students adversely by inhibiting them on focus on their pivotal assignment.
The second worth-mentioning reason comes to my mind is that should teacher assert their beliefs in the social or political realm in the classroom, this will plant the seed of conflict. To delineate, students especially at younger ages, which are not mature enough in order to distinguish between harmful or innocuous information they absorb, consider their teacher as a role model and incline to follow their teacher attitude which could be precarious knowing and following the teacher's vantage view in non-academic issues give rise to the student have prejudice in given social or political standpoint and contemplate other opinions invalid and false which could have resulted in serious controversy with other in term of communication with other people. By the way of illustration, my young brother during their elementary school, had a teacher with a racist social standpoint which had a profound effect on my brother's mindset and causes inappropriate behaviors with his immigrant friend in school. Consequently, teachers should avoid representing their opinions in other fields than the academic and educational field in order to avert harmful behavior and contentious.
To draw a conclusion, it is not advantageous for teachers to assert their political and social views in the classroom. According to their profound impact on students, Not only this could result in aggressive behavior with opposite viewpoint, but it also has an adverse effect on intellectual abilities and lead to become a narrow-minded person in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...al role in the educational aspect of an individuals life and consider as one of the most no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ven curriculum and train students to be an excel expert in their research and academic f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... maintaining political or social debate, this will affect the academic performanc...
^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...be precarious knowing and following the teachers vantage view in non-academic issues giv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, therefore, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2581.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42226890756 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03894742197 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483193277311 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.908050003 48.9658058833 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 172.066666667 100.406767564 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7333333333 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467484222587 0.236089414692 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198505003268 0.076458572812 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127424466191 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331327356057 0.150856017488 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714710191528 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 11.7677419355 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.