In any society, the educational system is of high importance, and teachers, as a noticeable element in the development of education, should be considered and valued. With this in mind, some people contend that nowadays, in comparison to the past, teachers are not cherished as much as they deserve. I do believe that this statement is true and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, we live in an era in which technology and science are flourishing at a galloping rate, and as a result, lots of platforms have been created that students can use to gain information. Conversely, In the past, the internet was not developed on large scale and people had no-or at best restricted- access to the internet and data. Being the only resource for gaining knowledge, teachers played a decisive role in the success of students. Keeping this in mind, students felt they owed their teachers and respected them. To clarify, nowadays a great number of students think that classes are dispensable and they are reluctant to attend the class since they think they can learn by downloading tutorial videos or watching online classes. Hence, they do not respect their teachers and appreciate them very much.
Furthermore, as we all know, in this hectic era, money can be an indicator of a person's prosperity and importance. If people assume that teaching is a hard job and has a profound impact on the progress of society, they should ask the government to increase teachers' income. But, in contrast with the past, nowadays teachers' income is classified in the lowest incomes and they are deprived of welfare. So, how individuals can claim that they appreciate teachers while they are careless about the comfort of teachers?
To sum up, taking into account what was already mentioned, I contend that teachers nowadays are less appreciated not only because they lack sufficient income but also as a result of enormous information available on the internet that makes their profession less important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tic era, money can be an indicator of a persons prosperity and importance. If people as...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciety, they should ask the government to increase teachers income. But, in contra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02678571429 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80146487181 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574404761905 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0456099474 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.642857143 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125734673797 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502505170249 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458950154212 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807008250004 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273773925845 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.