Teachers were more appreciated and valued by the society in the past than today
Since the dawn of civilization, education has been playing a crucial role in people’s lives. In addition, no one can deny the fact that teachers are the cornerstone of the educational system.However, there has been a long standing discussion about whether teachers are less appreciated by the society today than in the past. some may hold the view that people valued teachers more today, while, some others take the opposite viewpoint. personally, I believe that teachers are not as appreciated today as in the past. In the following essay, I will elaborate on my standpoint using two reasonable pieces of evidence.
The first point to be mentioned is that increasing means of learning to put a threat on the value on teachers. It is generally agreed that the technological devices and types of equipment are developing at a galloping rate. Additionally, developing these technological devices like smartphones, laptops, and tablets, to name but a few pave the way for learning and informing much feasible than before. people who live nowadays have the opportunity to learn with the help of these devices. moreover, Accessing to high-speed internet not only enables doors for grasping new materials but also opens doors for recognizing teacher’s faults and mistakes that can hit the value and status of them. take a personal experience as an example. When I studied in high school, I used to take an online course with a native speaker for fostering my english skills. Thus, I had broad knowledge in this area. but someday my english teacher pronounced the pronunciation of the world 'circumstance' wrongly. I attempted to correct him but he neglects me. consequently, the next day I rebut his pronunciation by applying a long man dictionary that leads to his excitement.
Another reason worth saying is that the economic well-being of families has developed thanks to industrialization. With this in mind, people are more inclined to have children with high literacy. Therefore, the quantity of teachers has increased. increasing the number of teachers who teach students not only spoil the quality of them, but also make them less valuable than before. According to a recent study that has been published by Time magazine, the efficiency of teachers teaching these days are dropped. moreover, statistics show that the people who are knowledgeable are more cherished by their audiences. As a consequent, No one cast doubt on this argument that the fewer teachers are knowledgeable, the less they would be cherished and valued.
To sum up briefly, one can deduce that teachers are not appreciated enough today due to the developing technological devices that enable people to learn by themselves and increasing the quantity that results in decreasing the quality of teachers has spoiled the value of them. However, there are things to be said that will challenge the points I made in the above paragraphs. All in all, further research is needed to more accurately assess the merit of the points I argued.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...e cornerstone of the educational system.However, there has been a long standing discuss...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... by the society today than in the past. some may hold the view that people valued te...
^^^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...ociety today than in the past. some may hold the view that people valued teachers mo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personally
...ome others take the opposite viewpoint. personally, I believe that teachers are not as app...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...nd informing much feasible than before. people who live nowadays have the opportunity ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...o learn with the help of these devices. moreover, Accessing to high-speed internet not o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...t can hit the value and status of them. take a personal experience as an example. Wh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 900, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...us, I had broad knowledge in this area. but someday my english teacher pronounced t...
^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Increasing
...the quantity of teachers has increased. increasing the number of teachers who teach studen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...achers teaching these days are dropped. moreover, statistics show that the people who ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that teachers are not appreciated enough today due to the developing technologica...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2532.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02602619885 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534552845528 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8431464274 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65384615385 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291401814433 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661877703069 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965890052824 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186265862963 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117680114849 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.