teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past
Every one of us knows that teachers are most responsible and they play big roll into children's development. As a result, many parents and children respect professors. Accordingly, many people think that teachers are not as respected as they were in the past. From my vantage point, teachers were really more appreciated in the past than they are today.
First of all, in the past teachers were only source through which children gained knowledge. For example, in the past people could not afford television or computers to their children. Like a result, children were more eager to go to school and to learn new things about the world. Moreover, throughout the lecturers, pupils in the past couldn't be distracted by the intelligent appliances such as mobile phones, tablets or smart watches which is very common case today. Personally, I think that many children today using their phones during the lecturers, and they are unaware how much disrespect they show for their lecturers without paying attention to their professors. This is a huge and very crucial factor who make me to think that teachers aren't very respected today.
Second, today's modern families, especially parents defend their children and in most cases they always blame the teachers about their children behavior. For instance, if children are not so good at school their parents, without to see the big picture, immediately make the professor responsible for their children's failure. As a result, many children are spoil which increase the possibility they to disrespect their teachers without paying attention during the classes. Furthermore, I have heard many examples where student yell at the professors or make fun with them without to get responsibility for their bad behavior. The examples I have heard and seen have shown me that today's modern generation don't respect the professors, and the positive influences that lecturers give to the students are not as appreciated as it was in the past.
To sum up, I believe that children don't respect the teachers as in the past and I have two main reasons to support my opinion. Firstly, the modern technology make drastic changes on children's behavior which is the one of the main reasons why they behave in so disrespectful manner to their professors. Secondly, I think that parents don't respect the teacher as in the past, and because children are with their parents during the most of the day, they learn from them and behave in the same way, disrespecting their lecturer. These are two main reasons why teachers were more regarded in the past. Simply, professors in the past represented a symbol of knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ghout the lecturers, pupils in the past couldnt be distracted by the intelligent applia...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 748, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ctor who make me to think that teachers arent very respected today. Second, todays ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... shown me that todays modern generation dont respect the professors, and the positiv...
^^^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t. To sum up, I believe that children dont respect the teachers as in the past and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...fessors. Secondly, I think that parents dont respect the teacher as in the past, and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, in most cases, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05733944954 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67606497533 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451834862385 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2516417642 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.95 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186358859533 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772917736419 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740275365754 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143927445663 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521042181108 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.