Teaching is harder today than it was in the past.
Nowadays, people are attaching more and more importance on education. Some people believe that teaching is harder today than it was in the past. However, I disagree with that. I believe that under the assistance of technology and social welfare, it has been easier for teachers to teach now.
First of all, as the increasing use of computer, teaching is becoming simpler and simpler. Teachers now can use the big screen in the classroom and show the slices to the students instead of wasting the time on writing on the blackboard. Teachers can use the time that is saved from writing on the blackboard to teach more knowledge or make some quiz for students. For example, when I was at high school, there was no screen or a projector in my classroom at first. In which case teachers had to write all of their points on the blackboard if they were not included in our textbooks, which wasted a lot of time. We have to wait until the teacher finish the writing and continue the course. However, after one year, our school bought projectors for each of the classroom, which teachers can use to project their slices onto the big screen instead of having to write on the blackboard, which really saved a lot of time since we would no longer have to wait for the teacher. So, the conclusion is that technology helps teachers to make teaching easier.
In addition, well-developed social welfare system for teachers helps make teaching easier. Since it can attract many people to become a teacher, which means that there can be more teacher and less students in a single class, making teaching easier. Taking my uncle for example, he was a teacher in a junior high school. In the past, there were like up to 100 students in a single classroom, he could not even remember all the names of each students, not to mention to make special studying plans for each students. However, he told me that in recent years, more and more teachers are working in his school, with the stable number of students and increasing number of teachers, there are less students that one teacher need to teach. There are only 30 students in each class, making it possible for teacher not only to remember all his students' name, but also to making a special teaching plan considering every students' situation. Also, he had lower pressure on correcting his students' homework. So well-established social welfare policy does help teachers to teach more easily.
Taking what has been discussed above into consideration, both technology and social welfare helps teachers to make teaching easier than in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eans that there can be more teacher and less students in a single class, making teac...
^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ncreasing number of teachers, there are less students that one teacher need to teach...
^^^^
Line 5, column 912, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...special teaching plan considering every students situation. Also, he had lower pressure ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, well, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80224719101 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55260523004 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444943820225 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1604807719 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.761904762 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1904761905 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183185368859 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765644844846 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147765165637 0.0737576698707 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167096063964 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108703097636 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.