There are many news stories about current event that helps people take a break from reading or listening to the news for a few days or weeks. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, it is beneficial to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks.
News gives us a comprehensive understanding of the current event that people need to learn about. Despite its horrendous and upsetting information about our surrounding, our reluctance to hearing it may counter productive to us in many aspects. In my opinion, no matter how disturbing is the news, we should never miss it even a few days. Why I feel this way, I will explain in the subsequent paragraphs.
the primary reasons is that being updated with news, we can save ourselves from the impending danger. Our nature is full of unprecedented events which can harm our lives in several ways; the only way to be escape from it, receiving alerting information from the valid source and prepare according to it. For instance; different earth quakes and sunami occurrence can be hard to predict on our own. To be keep away from falling in this pitfall, we need to updated with the information about the climate analyis and risk management center through media. If in case, we miss this information accidently, then we will be unable to run instantly from it and may loss our lives at the calamities.
Another reasons is that alluding the information even for ephemeral time can also detrimental for the financial invester. Many business are swiftly changed as they governed by different variable factor acting at the same time. In the even slightest miss of the information, they may fail to cope with the market and can loss huge fortune. For example; stock market exchange is highly unstable area where share price rise and fall within a second. So investor in this sector should pay attention to every details so that they would not miss the profitable share.
In conclusion, news is always the best way for us to gain the consciousness about the certain event. Therefore, it would be better not to neglect it even for a minute especially for the business oriented person and to make us safe from near potential calamities.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 58
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 54
- "Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. " 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- It is easy for family member in present than past 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'evens'?
...ng is the news, we should never miss it even a few days. Why I feel this way, I will...
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...plain in the subsequent paragraphs. the primary reasons is that being updated w...
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
... at the calamities. Another reasons is that alluding the information even for ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87537993921 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73136794283 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58358662614 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2421865535 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160459804369 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586523688126 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584442358707 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107124761349 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045081437922 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.