There are many news stories about current event that helps people take a break from reading or listening to the news for a few days or weeks. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, it is beneficial to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks.
When it comes to news stories, there are different kinds of new stories. Nowadays, people are able to escape from stressed pressure by reading or listening to the news.
However, whether to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks can benefit human beings or not would be an argument. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement. The reasons for my taking this position are as follows.
To begin with, in modern society, people should catch up with the trends to maintain the relationship between friends or colleges. In other words, news stories can become a topic for people's chatting in our daily life. Therefore, stopping getting news for a few days may not benefit our daily life. For example, one of my colleges, Jerry, is an out-going person. He can always have a joyful conversation with others. Once a day, there were final baseball games in Major League Baseball. Even though he did not watch baseball games every day, he could still watch the highlight moments from the news stories. The next day, he could share his aspects of the highlighted moments with his friends. That was a good way to maintain a relationship between friends. Thus, I think stopping watching or listening to news could not benefit us.
Second of all, the news stories can help people to come up with novel ideas because there are a lot of events that they do not truly notice. For instance, the founder of Uber, Travis, noticed the potential market in car-sharing
because there were news stories indicating that cars are idled or not used most of the time. He started to come up with a scheme for people who were willing to give a ride for others during the way to work. Now, Uber becomes the most popular platform for carpooling and gain a significant profit for it. Hence, the pause of reading or watching the news would not refresh ones' ideas.
Furthermore, there is special instruction broadcasted by news under certain emergency circumstances. To be more specific, when people face a large-scaled emergency accident, they would have no idea how to deal with it. Under the situation, helpful instruction would be broadcasted by news stories. For instance, currently, the situation of the global pandemic is quite serious all over the world. The governments are trying to stop the virus spreading. Thus,
they would announce the health instruction like the places where there are a lot of confirmed cases. The instruction will be changed or altered based on the circumstance every day. Therefore, consistently receiving news can be beneficial for people to prevent severe virus infection.
To sum up, we need to receive news stories every day to follow up on new information regarding of trends, marketing, or even health instruction. The aforementioned examples can present the benefit of consistently receiving the news. Under no circumstances, can we exaggerate the importance of news stories. Therefore, I disagree with the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iced the potential market in car-sharing because there were news stories indicati...
^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... or watching the news would not refresh ones ideas. Furthermore, there is speci...
^^^^
Line 10, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rying to stop the virus spreading. Thus, they would announce the health instructi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99596774194 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74740914753 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504032258065 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5285089245 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4375 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.53405017921 176% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407057878992 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100533929519 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748808562448 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196105420227 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631354669681 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.