There is nothing that an uneducated person can teach an educated person

Many people believe that educated people are above uneducated people in the society, and hence, the educated can't learn anything from the uneducated. Others believe that educated people can learn a lot from uneducated people. If I were forced to choose, I definitely think that educated people can obtain some knowledge or character traits from the uneducated. I believe in this opinion due to several reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, educated people are not perfect, in terms of their behaviour or knowledge, and thus, must not believe that they are above uneducated people. They can learn about many important characteristics such as hard work or persistence from an uneducated person. Moreover, they can also understand the importance of showing gratitude and being humble. I have to admit that my opinion is highly influenced by my own personal experiences. For example, when I started working at Apple, which is one of the biggest corporations in the world, I was elated and was feeling on cloud nine. I started behaving arrogantly towards my friends and family since I had a high paying job and a good position in the company. However, this behavior of mine, started affected the work I did and performed very poorly in the company. A janitor, who was working in the company, changed my outlook on life. His humble nature and being friendly with people helped me realize that such characteristics are very important in a person's life. Therefore, after observing the janitor for a while, it helped me realize the important of being humble and down to earth. It also showed positive effects on my life style and started performing better at work. Thus, this example shows that an educated person can learn a lot from an uneducated person.

Secondly, educated people can also learn about being street smart and clever from uneducated people. Since, uneducated people do not have a formal degree, it becomes difficult to find jobs based on their education. Hence, they must be street smart and outwit others in order to make money or find jobs. Drawing from my own conclusions, my cousin, who obtained a degree in Computer Science from a prestigious university in US, attended a job interview hosted by a software company. In this interview, he was up against another candidate who did have any formal education in Computer Science. However, the uneducated person still managed to outsmart my cousin and ended up being hired. Hence, my cousin did not have a chance against him, since, he was more clever and had the wits to outsmart others. Therefore, this example shows that educated people can learn some important real world skills necessary to beat their opponents from the uneducated.

In light of the above mentioned reasons, I certainly believe that educated people can learn some important things from uneducated people in various ways.

Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot the society, and hence, the educated cant learn anything from the uneducated. Oth...
Line 3, column 1008, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...characteristics are very important in a persons life. Therefore, after observing the ja...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03526970954 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66175780873 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470954356846 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6337764339 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.08 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.28 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242937469975 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079917054191 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121470568751 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146849151576 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592196356577 0.0645574589148 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.