It is indisputable that the job plays a pivotal role in individual’s lives and it affects our lives in several aspects, Some people take the view that it is imperative to work faster and risk the making mistake, However, many other people hold the opposite point of view, as far as I concerned, I believe that it is better to work quickly and making a mistake. The number of controversies over this issue is overwhelming. I would explore some of the benefits which are more conspicuous for me in following paragraphs.
The first thing to be mentioned is that working faster equals doing more jobs. Thus, doing more job will provide the worker opportunity to come across with more problem which helps them to learn an inordinate amount of thing. The statistics show that the people who work more quickly are more likely to have a stronger conceptual understanding of the affair rather than those people who work slower and don’t make mistake.
Another significant point which deserves some word here is that if we look at the private life of a great scientist, the great explorer, and famous artists we will easily see that their success were depended on making the mistake in their career, and they learned lots of thing regarding their mistake. From my perspective, the mistake helps people to overcome the fear of failure. One of my personal experience is a compelling example of this issue, when I was twenty years old I worked for a company, my obligation was answering the people’s question, the amount of job was really overwhelming so I had to work fast in order to answer all question, at the end of each day although I made a lots of mistakes I felt sense of accomplishment and sense of achievement which helped me to boost my self-confidence.
Sum up, I can see both advantage and drawback of working hard but due to the aforementioned reasons which I have discovered above, I believe benefits of working faster are greater that work slowly, it can be surmised that work faster and making the mistake helps people to triumph over obstacles and achieve success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... issue is overwhelming. I would explore some of the benefits which are more conspicuous for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...stake in their career, and they learned lots of thing regarding their mistake. From my perspe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... at the end of each day although I made a lots of mistakes I felt sense of accomplishm...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, really, regarding, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80833333333 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84533270636 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.493667799 48.9658058833 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 173.1 100.406767564 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.6045352989 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289595826337 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106501047452 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878756495285 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188167227487 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523057848928 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 11.7677419355 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.