Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and e

In this contemporary life, it is indisputable that friendship plays a pivotal role in the guidance and happiness of the people. Many people nowadays focus on creating their wide social networking by making friends with as many individuals as possible. as far as I am concerned, maintaining a friendship with a small number of friends is much more important for my own emotion and happiness. The number of issue over limitation our friends are overwhelming. I would discover some of the issues which are most conspicuous for me in following paragraphs.
The first important point to be mentioned is that old friends usually show stronger loyalty than those newly acquainted fellows. That means, no matter what happens, these friends would always stand by your side and provide you with support without any questions. Talking from personal my experience, a few years ago encountered to a terrible situation which my factory bankrupted due to financial crises after us sanctions, so I lost all my money but in that time my friend came to me and helped me without any questions and also he borrowed me a huge amount of money to rebuild my factory, without his help I couldn’t prevail over that difficulty in such an easy way. Therefore, if I hadn’t had intimate friends I wouldn’t have solved that crises.
Another significant point which deserve some word here is that, the old friends are counted as bloody friends which they are more than casual acquaintance, they are always doing their best in order to fulfill your expectation such as they provide you companionship, they are always willing to lend a hand in day to day problem which arises. on the other hand, if you have an inordinate number of friends with law quality of friendship they won’t try the best in order to satisfy you because you are not in their priority.
To make a long story short, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I take that view that the quality of friendship is much more important than quantity, therefore I encourage people to build the strong friendship and also people should be appreciative of their best friends

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...s with as many individuals as possible. as far as I am concerned, maintaining a fr...
^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...oncerned, maintaining a friendship with a small number of friends is much more important for my o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ends are overwhelming. I would discover some of the issues which are most conspicuous for m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...and in day to day problem which arises. on the other hand, if you have an inordina...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97198879552 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90324479775 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563025210084 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.071289669 48.9658058833 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.916666667 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275430260148 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103883703249 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673592663626 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170612939087 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800969082592 0.0645574589148 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.