"Slow and steady win's the race''- a famous proverb which means who are steady and wise can do, which seems impossible earlier time. In our modern era, sometimes, it is necessary to be quick and take the risk, but in the end, it is them, who work with the patient and accurately gets the prize. So, I disagree with the statement that it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct for the following reasons.
First of all, quality is the most valued feature in the world. It is better to take time and do quality work. Think about the business where quality is everything. For instance, in market, there is a lot of mobile phones which cost very low. But, generally, people buy quality products like the smartphone of apple. Apple is a brand and they do not produce normal products on the market. They take their time, invest in design, technologies, features and so on. After so much consideration and implication, they marketize their products. People all around the world buy their products as they are good in quality.
Secondly, mistakes can cost a lot. Sometimes, some mistakes are unforgivable. In modern time, people are busy and often forget to correct their mistakes. For instance, think about the garment factories located in China, Bangladesh, India who takes orders from buyers who are sticks about the quality of their products. Generally, these garment factories are on a hurry and sometimes, they mistakenly do not check for a rejected product. But, by any chance, the buyer finds a single product that does not fulfill his/her requirement he can delay or even should not pay the bill. In this case, a simple matter can cost a lot.
In conclusion, it is important to make work with complete efficiency and care. It may take a little bit more time to produce quality work, but, it will surely increase one's productivity and reputation. So, every word should be done with great consistency and chack for every possible mistake and do it correctly
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is correct for the following reasons. First of all, quality is the most valued...
^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...esh, India who takes orders from buyers who are sticks about the quality of their produ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...lete efficiency and care. It may take a little bit more time to produce quality work, but,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...lity work, but, it will surely increase ones productivity and reputation. So, every ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82386363636 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5570706946 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6931198127 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1818181818 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258703545148 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702965975686 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139795492139 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182804506674 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162443748481 0.0645574589148 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.