One of the important issues of educational institutions is the quality and efficiency of teaching and education. Also one of
The first reason coming to mind is that teachers’ assessments are more impartial than students and the teacher can manipulate student’s evaluations easier than teachers’ evaluations. There is a lot of methods to influence others’ decisions such as framing, anchoring, a.
The second reason is that teachers know better what efficiency means and what it involves and what it doesn’t. The word other, share their knowledge and argue about the implication of efficiency or a unique case happened in the school.
The third reason which deserves
In summary, all the aforementioned ideas bring us to the conclusion that teachers’ assessment has a plethora of advantages compare to students as they have more ability, interest, and knowledge to do it better. Thus, let us hope that schools take this issue more seriously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d efficiency of teaching and education. Also one of the important criteria for stude...
^^^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nd even have experiences of using them. Therefore they easily understand these fraudulent...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 704, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s whom you never have a class with them in future, you will not have an enough interest t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in summary, such as, in most cases, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3218.0 1977.66487455 163% => OK
No of words: 584.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5102739726 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2344870612 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465753424658 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1005.3 618.680645161 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0318498855 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.965517241 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1379310345 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89655172414 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0494070551701 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01762952577 0.076458572812 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.024449627787 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0391673314706 0.150856017488 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290573631644 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.