Nowadays, perhaps no subject in human society is as controversial as future prediction based on contemporary evidence. Recent discussion had centered on whether the rate of car use will be less or more than today in twenty years from now. In my opinion, due to people awareness regarding negative impacts of automobile in use, this trend will be declined based on following reasons.
Technology has increasingly changed all aspects of lives including transportation systems. As matter of fact, people are likely to use different forms of rapid and modernized vehicle for transport means such as public aircrafts or rapid and convenient metros. In this regard, most of people use these vehicles to commute distance between place of work and place of residence at ease without any traffic jam. Since it would take less time and money for traveling, it seems logical if the rate of private automobiles decrease.
In addition, nowadays air pollution is worldwide crisis. This problems needs more concerns to be addressed. By having raised the people's knowledge about air pollution consequence such as global warming, there is a promising possibility that demand for private car use would be decreased. Furthermore, the government adopt some policies including increasing the price of fuel to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases as the major reason of air pollution. As a result, these two strategy is widely applied to reduce people dependence on car use in long run.
On the other hand, it should be noted that modern lifestyle has been undergone lots of considerable changes compared with traditional one. There has been a growing appetite for sedimentary lifestyle. By which that means, most of people are seeking to increase their quality of life as the modern technology has paved the way for rapid vehicle. It would not be surprising if any new kind of automobile invent to be environmentally friendly too boost the level of welfare.
To recapitulate, all aspects of future amount of car in use have considered comprehensively. As it was mentioned not only increased people education but also improvement in public transportation have played significant role in decreasing car in use. Although in some situation people will pursue sedimentary lifestyle, the authority can provide some incentive schemes to minimize the car emission carbon dioxide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... and convenient metros. In this regard, most of people use these vehicles to commute distance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...days air pollution is worldwide crisis. This problems needs more concerns to be addr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'need'.
Suggestion: need
...tion is worldwide crisis. This problems needs more concerns to be addressed. By havin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...s to be addressed. By having raised the peoples knowledge about air pollution consequen...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...mentary lifestyle. By which that means, most of people are seeking to increase their quality o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to boost'?
Suggestion: to boost
...e invent to be environmentally friendly too boost the level of welfare. To recapitulate,...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'in addition', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285365853659 0.229887763892 124% => OK
Verbs: 0.160975609756 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112195121951 0.0866891130778 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0341463414634 0.046263068375 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0170731707317 0.0685040099705 25% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.158536585366 0.118717715034 134% => OK
Participles: 0.0658536585366 0.0351676179071 187% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.97266899783 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0731707317073 0.0887237588012 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.019512195122 0.0209618222197 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00487804878049 0.0139019557991 35% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2359.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 377.0 408.028673835 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25729442971 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48200974243 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397877984085 0.338922669872 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31299734748 0.251872472559 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238726790451 0.174417080927 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172413793103 0.112833075102 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97266899783 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607427055703 0.524397521467 116% => OK
Word variations: 73.517804343 59.2087087015 124% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8421052632 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4803435809 48.84282405 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.157894737 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 51.1418400112 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.40229885057 1.45489161554 165% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237912753144 0.300154397459 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0797528180291 0.103427244359 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0562366071345 0.0752933317313 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.508090867314 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126518440641 0.151897553556 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872262807891 0.114077575197 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055699806285 0.0781384742642 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.210813738092 0.336927656856 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.041663323133 0.067059652881 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155370006669 0.210909579961 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560414410358 0.0618886996521 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.