Both public transportation and personal vehicles are vitally important in our lives; yet, public transportation is not so efficient in terms of many aspects. Therefore, in my opinion, there will be more cars in use than there are today. I feel this way for several reasons.
One reason is that personal vehicles enable us to manage our times more efficiently by reducing the amount of time spending for arriving somewhere. To be more specific, it is much faster option compared with public transportation. For example, let’s suppose that you want to hang out with your friends outside, and place you determined is too far away from your house. As you do not have a car, then you will go there by metro or bus. However, you will have to wait for metro or bus in the station, which wastes your time. Instead of spending your time for waiting bus or metro, you would enjoy with your friends. For this reason, the number of cars will be higher than there are today.
Second reason is since population is increasing, people are in need of cars more than today. In other word, cities become bigger in terms of area which hinders to arrive target destination by foot. Moreover, in the case of public transportation, people need to use more than two bus or metro in big cities which swells cost. For instance, since Istanbul is pretty huge city, it is hard to go from a county to another county which poses a necessity for cars. That’s why I believe that number of cars are going to be ascended rather than decreasing.
Lastly, people really like driving car. Surveys have showed that people enjoy a lot while they are driving car, because they believe that having a car refers to a good social status in community. That’s why they attempt to buy more luxurious cars. For this, they try to gain more money. Once they save adequate money to buy a better car, they sell old one to other people who posses old car. To satisfy their demands, manufacturers produce more cars. As an example, most probably all of us see some second hand car selling pages on social media. In fact, all of those second hand cars has been manufactured before. Since they are not modern, meaning that demands are replaced with new cars, they are being sold by people. As a result, total number of car in the world is not alleviated.
In conclusion, even most of the people think that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today, it is impossible, as cars are part of our lives; henceforth, their numbers are going to be elevated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...ewhere. To be more specific, it is much more faster option compared with public transportat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t you want to hang out with your friends outside, and place you determined is too...
^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...reason, the number of cars will be much more higher than there are today. Second reason ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'bigger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: bigger
...han today. In other word, cities become more bigger in terms of area which hinders to arriv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'metro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'metros'.
Suggestion: metros
...people need to use more than two bus or metro in big cities which swells cost. For in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63157894737 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44937979348 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504385964912 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3574707158 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2307692308 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65384615385 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22878652202 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702439570807 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713890284033 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145477397716 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700103957252 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.