The lecturer explains that reducing working days is not as beneficial as expected. According to the reading, this is a great idea to increase company profits, reduce unemployment rate, provide extra times to be spent with their families. However, lecturer suggest that it may not affect or deteriorate current status of companies or employees.
First of all, author points out that decreasing working days lead to an increase in company profits since hiring new employees do not result in additional payroll cost. However, this point is challenged by lecturer. Lecturer explains that reducing working hours come up with requirement to new employees, meaning that more health insurance, office spaces, and computers have to be provided.
In additionally, author claims that unemployment rate is reduced as it happens. Lecturer rebuts this argument. She proposes that this may cause to work over time in working days. In other word, it may ascend expectations. For instance, boss might assume that work done in 4 days ought to be as same as work done in 5 days.
Finally, reading suggests that this provides more time to employee to be spent with their families this may enhance quality of their lives. However, according to lecture, this is not the case. In fact, in regards to reading, this might descend job opportunities, since they are not going to use that extra time to improve themselves; henceforth, this harms their advancement in careers. Also, boss may not give priority to get promotion to them, as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, may, so, well, for instance, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.116 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71742525196 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7223356008 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2666666667 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272802510349 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808344875768 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704680961368 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168465807946 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277362193539 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.