Development in life is a continuous process. With the invention of electronics work has become simplified and fast.
However, life today has become more comfortable and easier than it was when your grandparents were children. I strongly agree with the writer's statement. Following are the reasons and examples for holding my opinion.
To begin with, change is uninvietable in life and is a continuous process. Inventions of technology especially in the last two decades has got tremendous change in the lifestyle of people. In particular, work became automated and simplified. Whereas,
previously during the period of our grandparents most of the works were done manually involving lot physical stress besides time consuming. For example, let us take household works such as grinding, washing clothes etc., were done manually with a lot of effort. More over they were time consuming. Conversely, now they became automated and performed using machines.
therefore, life has become easier and comfortable than it was a couple of decades ago.
Further more, life has become more comfortable. However, in the past the facilities for a few and limited only to small group of population as every one could not afford them. Whereas, now twenty years down the lane the technology is so improved. Moreover, the progress in the people financially made wide range of population to afford and lead a comfortable life. For instance, the number of people using cars, air conditioners were very less during the period of our grandparents. It was only limited to rich people. However, now it has become more common every other person has it.
To put in to nutshell, development in various fields has revolutionized the lifestyle of people, especially in the past two decades. Besides the fact that we all started depending a lot on machinery and technology, the life today has become more easier and comfortable than it was for our grandparents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ere children. I strongly agree with the writers statement. Following are the reasons an...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., work became automated and simplified. Whereas, previously during the period of our ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecame automated and simplified. Whereas, previously during the period of our gran...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...utomated and performed using machines. therefore, life has become easier and comfortable...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 242, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...d technology, the life today has become more easier and comfortable than it was for our gra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, as for, for example, for instance, in particular, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23322683706 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93047362952 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517571884984 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4798165405 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4545454545 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2272727273 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261357545651 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751409928297 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985380025625 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146846518594 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145235521975 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.