Both the reading and the lecture are about the cane toad which destroys the other species by dominating the place they reached. The reading talks about the way to regulate ecosystem of Australia where the cane toads came and multiplied. The speaker of the listening says that the ways from the lecture on how to eliminate the cane toads are not effective.
First of all, the author of the reading thinks that building a national fence can help the regulating number of the cane toad. The lecture casts doubt on what the reading says. The lecturer remarks that the cane toad flows with their young and eggs and introduces through the water and they can carry to the other places. Stopping the spread of toad is not possible since we cannot control the water flows.
Secondly, the passage believes that volunteers can control the number of the cane toad by capturing and destroying them directly. The speaker of the record opposes about the reading. The lecture thinks that untrained volunteers may capture even native frogs by identifying wrongly.
Finally, the text recommend the way that developing a disease-causing virus to decrease the population of the cane toad. The way that suggested by author argued from this: cane toad is a origin part of American ecosystem. Removing whole cane toad can victimize on the entire ecosystem while it can break the balances between the species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r places. Stopping the spread of toad is not possible since we cannot control the...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y author argued from this: cane toad is a origin part of American ecosystem. Remo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 234.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97008547009 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45568882934 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521367521368 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 618.680645161 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6533914588 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4615384615 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0130968460805 0.236089414692 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00520047304372 0.076458572812 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0180149670702 0.0737576698707 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00848888477204 0.150856017488 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147031797248 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.