TPO 16- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Travelling is important part of our lives. It is vital because individuals can relax and unwind in hectic schedule of work. Some people believe that travelling in a group led by a tour guide is the best way to explore different place. In my humble opinion, I think it is better to travel on your own without the help of tour guide. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, travelling to unfamiliar places are best enjoyed at your own pace. Exploring different culture, food, beautiful scenery are most memorable when you are not rushed by group of tourist to savour the moment of the the tour. For instance, I travelled to Cebu City with my friends we did not get the services of local tour guide because we want to explore the city on our own. We want to experience other activities not offered by tour guide, our little adventure are arranged mostly on our group liking. Meaning all the activities and places to visit are well researched by the group. As a result we had a great time on our visit to Cebu, we did all the things on our bucket list like canyoonering, Whale shark watching in Oslob and City tour. It was indeed a meaningful trip because our group was complete and we accomplished everything we want to visit. We also did food trip for Lechon in Carcar and visited CNT lechon and Rico's lechon and it was so delicious and worth the travel. Rico's lechon was 4 hours drive from the main city Cebu and we go for it because we want to try the delcasy of Cebu has to offer.
Secondly, Travelling helps people gain new knowledge and information about the place. Traveling with a guide are routinely places visited by tourist and the location are very congested with visitors. For example, when we traveled to Japan last year, we joined a tour guide and explore the city of Kyoto. In my surprise, the tour guide was jolly but we are always on the rush to see the tourist spot and we did not enjoy the place because we are joined by other people we barely know. As a result, our Japan try was not memorable because we did not explore much of the places in Japan because are schedule are so fixed and we can't altered the schedule given to us by the tour guide. To sum up, I believe that it is better to travel without guide because your schedule will not be flexible and most of the places that in the itinerary are common places and not worthy to go to.
To summarize, I believe that is is better to travel alone or with the comfort of your loved ones. It is because travelling with the help with tour guide tends to be boring and routinary activities done by tourist and you will not enjoy much.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...roup of tourist to savour the moment of the the tour. For instance, I travelled to Cebu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...roup of tourist to savour the moment of the the tour. For instance, I travelled to Cebu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the rush to see the tourist spot and we did not enjoy the place because we ar...
^^
Line 5, column 628, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ecause are schedule are so fixed and we cant altered the schedule given to us by the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
... go to. To summarize, I believe that is is better to travel alone or with the comf...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38508064516 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32788006388 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425403225806 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4123150616 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8636363636 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165502909951 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667335961132 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507634362464 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140483242499 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525416627726 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.