TPO 22: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
In our modern era having acceptable knowledge about social and political affairs is of great importance and there are lots of available sources like mass media and publications which provide information for all people. Every individual has his/her own notion about political issues based on their knowledge. In this regard, some people adhere to the opinion that teachers should not talk about their political and social views in the classroom. I strongly concede this statement due to some obvious reasons. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently substantiate my point of view.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that most of the students, especially teenage groups, are blinded to the facts and could be easily deviated and everyone with a little speaking skill can wash out their brain. We should consider the fact that except the political and social experts other people's knowledge about these issues is limited, they do not have a broad horizon, and most of the time their inferences are distorted by lots of external factors. In this respect, teachers are not an exception and they should not easily talk about their viewpoints. Most of the students consider their teacher as their role model and it is probable that they follow their teacher thoughts without any logical inference. Therefore, it is crucial that teachers do not expose their beliefs and political views in the classroom.
Another important point coming to my mind is that when teachers reveal their political view it would not have any beneficial repercussion, as political discussions in the class are merely a sheer waste of time. Furthermore, it is probable that students change their minds about their teacher. As a personal experience, when I was a master student, in the first section of the radiobiology class, the professor initiated to talk about his political view and his speech lasted for 40 minutes. He had totally groundless notions and squandered the time of the class. It was a bad first impression and lots of the students changed their minds about him as they understood that he is a radical opponent of the conservative party.
In conclusion, with contemplation for the aforementioned reasons, it is crystal clear for everyone that teachers should not talk about their political views in the classroom. As they have limited knowledge which would be misleading and also the students may change their minds about their teachers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13316582915 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72580064232 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.818652179 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.176470588 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314013736977 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119067101413 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800339965819 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212082875212 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03750410771 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.