TPO 22- independent
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that in today's sophisticated world we live in, the period of time that students spend in the school plays a prominent role in their future lives and career. It is momentous to consider the fact that teachers should take their responsibilities in the best manner for upbringing more erudite people in the future society. Some may think that teachers should speak with their students about their social or political thinking. However, others may believe that it is better for instructors to do not say anything about their personal thought about social or political issues. I firmly concur with the latter group's idea. In what follows, my reasons supporting this opinion would be delineated.
To begin with, the teachers' point of view about political or social matters might not be authentic. As students are often good followers of their instructors, the viewpoints of their teachers have a great impact on their mind and thinks. Thus, pupils might get involved with a great deal of incorrect information which might affect their view points about that matter. By way of illustration, my math teacher always tried to impose her view about the education system of my country. After a while, students found out, because of her lower salary, she discriminated about the education system. When her wage increased after one year, her viewpoint about the same system varied so much.
The second reason is rooted in the fact that school is a place for education. Students go to school for promotion of their scientific knowledge. If they want to know about the political or social issues they can search on the Internet or ask from other people who are special in these fields. Therefore, teachers should teach the lessons and try to prepare the students for their future lives or career. It is evident that an experienced teacher has lots of abilities to find the best methods for their teaching. It follows that they should take their responsibilities in the best manner and try to pave the ways for students to grasp the concepts in their lessons.
In short, all the aforementioned grounds lead us to draw a conclusion that instructors should not share their social or political opinions to their students in order to prevent expressing possible false information. Furthermore, students in the school learn how to learn their lessons or interact with each other. So, if they want to know about the political issue they will ask their questions from others who have a good knowledge about.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ays sophisticated world we live in, the period of time that students spend in the school plays...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
... people in the future society. Some may think that teachers should speak with their s...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir lessons or interact with each other. So, if they want to know about the political i...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'in short', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246220302376 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.136069114471 0.158761421928 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0885529157667 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0280777537797 0.046263068375 61% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0820734341253 0.0685040099705 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149028077754 0.118717715034 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0129589632829 0.0351676179071 37% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.63294349469 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0323974082073 0.0309702414327 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0863930885529 0.0887237588012 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0302375809935 0.0209618222197 144% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129589632829 0.0139019557991 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2543.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 427.0 408.028673835 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95550351288 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344262295082 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229508196721 0.251872472559 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168618266979 0.174417080927 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103044496487 0.112833075102 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63294349469 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512880562061 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 57.9163961123 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3333333333 20.5533526081 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2801940617 48.84282405 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.095238095 120.699889404 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.5533526081 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.644075263715 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 43.2841530055 45.7405998639 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.65789473684 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123754484127 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0849632141504 0.0752933317313 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498272440484 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13223727844 0.151897553556 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.373570310577 0.336927656856 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0928501796315 0.067059652881 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.