People always love to share their own opinion to others and then hope others to support their view. Thus, the interesting discussion about whether teachers should make their statement known to the student in the class is on the air. As far as I am concerned, make the subjective statement may bring more cons than pros.
Most importantly, avoiding the subjective social or political opinions can help teachers to deliver a lesson in a more objective way. It is widely-known that the subjective opinion from the individual cannot always maintain an objective view of the issue, because the individual, even the teacher, may ignore some fact he has never known before or did not want to know. In another word, the subjective opinion always represents one side of the whole issue. For example, Last time we got a visit in the Taiwan primary school, we had heard a lot about the misunderstand of the mainland China in the class. The teacher in the class, who dislikes the culture of the mainland China, use a ridiculous example that most people in the mainland China cannot afford to the frozen dumpling to illustrate the poverty of China. Therefore, avoiding the subjective opinion, even some ridiculous opinions, can be a best way to educate the student.
Additionally, lack of critical thinking and first-hand experience in students may serve as a reason for teachers not to make subjective social or political opinions. Just like the school we mentioned before, it were surprising that those students in the class just believed what their teacher said in the class without any critical thinking. After the class, some students even went to us and asked whether we can always get full in the mainland China. It is unbelievable that those students could ask such a stupid and old-fashion question even though they could find an answer easily from the internet or social media. What a terrible lesson experience with those teachers who always make their own subjective and even ridiculous view in the class is!
Admittedly, some social or political opinions from the teachers could be so unique that students can learn a lot from it, but the students' critical thinking on an issue or learning the knowledge in a more objective way could be more important. Therefore, instead of bringing up subjective social or political opinions, teachers should lead the students to develop their own opinions in a comprehensive and objective way with critical thinking.
All in all, it is safe to conclude that not to make the subjective social or political opinions in the class would be better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r did not want to know. In another word, the subjective opinion always represents...
^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rimary school, we had heard a lot about the misunderstand of the mainland China in the class. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
..., even some ridiculous opinions, can be a best way to educate the student. Add...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, then, therefore, thus, even so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99076212471 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69842235025 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459584295612 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8164164848 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0625 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0625 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212917881043 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805153646963 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582264523517 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134611128942 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512827147081 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.