workers are more satisfied with the many different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks.
Recent decades have witnessed the increasing worktime for people to spend at the word place, so the interesting topic like whether workers are more satisfied with the many different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks. As for me, I believe that many different tasks in their jobs seem to be better.
Most importantly, many different tasks in their jobs tend to be less boring. Just imagine how boring the people who have to do the same task everyday just like the robot are! Unlike the robot, the people are more likely to be frustrated or fewer working passion on their replicated works, and thus their working performance will decrease dramatically with increasing working times. Just like my cousin Joe, a university student who works a part-time job in the restaurant, he always complains to me that his daily job like serving the dishes is so boring, less challenged and even wasting his times. Besides, he believes that all the works he does in the restaurant can be replaced by the robots just like another new restaurant in Guangzhou. Therefore, those works with similar tasks not only lack the encouragement to use the workers' brain but also bring the larger possibilities of replacing by the machine.
In addition, many different tasks can promote the working abilities of workers all the ground. The different tasks always mean to require workers to gain some new knowledges or think more about how to improve their working performance. Through varies kinds of tasks, workers will gain lots of experiences which enable them to tackle more challenged problems or win higher positions in their careers. For example, my uncle Jay, an experienced engineer, has become the pioneer of researching the AI technology in his working field, because of his daily working experiences with new and innovative projects. He always told me that the routine, replicated and boring works will convince yourself with satisfactions of what you have done, even though you are out of step with the times. However, those satisfactions cannot bring you opportunities to get promotion.
In a word, workers are more satisfied with the many different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks, because of less boredom and more encouragement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...her workers are more satisfied with the many different tasks in their jobs rather than with si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...imilar tasks. As for me, I believe that many different tasks in their jobs seem to be better. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s seem to be better. Most importantly, many different tasks in their jobs tend to be less bor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...replacing by the machine. In addition, many different tasks can promote the working abilities...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rd, workers are more satisfied with the many different tasks in their jobs rather than with si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06182795699 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69527422014 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510752688172 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8902518833 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494936161108 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200567338443 0.076458572812 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.213206492684 0.0737576698707 289% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.453499355516 0.150856017488 301% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.246217483856 0.0645574589148 381% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.