It is hard to judge between doing work swiftly with high risk or doing duties slowly with low level of mistakes. Although type of job and situation has significant influence on priority of risk level and work speed, but I think trying to correct everything is more important than finishing job in minimum time.
First, in many industries accuracy is the main metric to success in market and providing products or services and it does not matter how long the projects are. For example forecasting the future of a specific product shows to company that how many products would be sold and according to this prediction resources and production lines will be allocated. So the major topic is the difference of estimation and reality while length of this project has minor priority in company's performance.
In other point, many times speeding the work causes flaw in results and that leads to restart processes which requires additional time to accomplish the job. Hence increasing the pace in work flows is equal to repeating activities and it is a wrong belief it could be enhance the duration of progress. For example a person who enter some data to computer quickly without any care will see many disorders in his data entry. Consequently time which has been spent in this case is more in comparison to working with caution.
Third, new modern life has been changed and people regard to different values in these days. Some terms like quality is more respected against quantity or accuracy is more advocated to swiftness. So a person who is not careless and evaluates everything and then take action will prosper in competition to the others. For instance as an expert he would be more paid in his professional experience or as a student would be achieve academic titles easily.
In conclusion, however position of time is strongly recommended in our universe but we can not neglect correctness and precise work to reach goals sooner.
- 55) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person should never make an important decision alone. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? (The answer is a sample not written by myself. The goal is to compare the 84
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes 70
- Some people think that family is the most important influence on young adults. Other people think that friends are the most important influence in young adults. Which view do you agree with? Use examples to support your position. 73
- TPO 42- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 35
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...job in minimum time. First, in many industries accuracy is the main metric to success ...
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... additional time to accomplish the job. Hence increasing the pace in work flows is eq...
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...l see many disorders in his data entry. Consequently time which has been spent in this case ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, then, third, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94207317073 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65083179508 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5401428698 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164643651195 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528056417494 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559548096464 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906001597957 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763545163205 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.