This might be a controversial topic due to the fact that the definition of qualified work varies from person to person. Some people may be of the opinion that it is better to work slower without any mistakes than working faster with many mistakes. I, however, support the opposite and will explore its reasons.
First of all, time plays a key role in our life. With the development of technology in different fields such as industry, transportation or communication, people are supposed to move quicker than ever. In order to gain success, either as an individual or organizational, you should deal with plenty of tasks in a short period of time. For instance, after the industrial revolution, people stopped producing hand made products that would take a lot of time. Industries provided with plant owners an opportunity to produce a great amount of product quickly. Those who preferred to produce hand made products, which were more perfectly and produced slower, failed.
Moreover, this speed may lead people to make more mistakes. Dealing with several tasks or being supposed to finish works in a short period of time may put high pressure on employees. In my opinion, this is not that important. Technology not only has increased our life speed but also has improved our perfection. Let me explain what I am trying to say. Let us imagine a journalist make a mistake and release the wrong news. He writes his column and post on the website of the newspaper and continues doing his job. In case of realizing any mistake, he can immediately correct it by rewriting the wrong part of the news. This was not possible before the advent of the internet since there was no chance to correct your mistakes.
To sum up, although there might be negative sides of working faster. To my way of thinking, its advantages weigh its disadvantages. This is because you can keep the pace of the era and mistakes are easy to be corrected now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ld deal with plenty of tasks in a short period of time. For instance, after the industrial rev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing supposed to finish works in a short period of time may put high pressure on employees. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81681681682 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71520963359 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618618618619 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3707982705 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.380952381 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158578157808 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404865267902 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441924261819 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931538815558 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297141915782 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.