TPO 29-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.

Teachers are the vital part of any educational institution. University reputation mostly comes from the professors' research activities. However, some people think that it is not needed to increase the salary of the teacher, but some disagree with this. In my opinion, I believe that more honorarium should ensure for the professor of the university. I feel this way for two most important reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, a handsome salary structure is the prerequisite of having a good and experienced professor. Since people nowadays, need to consider the money what they earn from the job, most of the Ph. D holder do not like to come back to our country after finishing higher study from abroad. If the university provides sufficient salary for the professor, then highly qualified people will return and work for a public university. For example, I recently read an article in a national newspaper, which contended that government should allow more money to the university so that the salary structure could improve otherwise no professors will be back in their country's university. It also reported that many prestigious young qualified people wish to back to their motherland and join national university but they do not do that because of very low salary in our country. Therefore, it's clear from this article that high salary is the key point to get a good professor.

Secondly, to improve the reputation of the university, this is mandatory now. Once people do a lot of their workplace even they did not get desire salary. But, the situation is changing now, and no one like to teach and work for the university if the salary is not satisfactory. If you get handsome money, you will do your best for your company and that will improve the university very much. For instance, my elder brother, a chemistry professor at North south university, work hard for his university. He teaches very well too. His performance was not so good before when he worked for a public university because he had to worry about his salary that time. Moreover, he had to take an extra class in other private universities to manage his livelihood. So, he did not concentrate on making good lecture. However, the same person awarded the greatest national research of the year and this happened because university provides enough money and found for teaching and research in his field of interest. So, I think this will not possible If the university ensures a good honorarium for his job.

In conclusion, it is clear from the discussion that university should increase the salary of the professor. This is because otherwise the university will not get good professor whose are the central power of the university, and because that will help the university to improve their reputation.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the university, this is mandatory now. Once people do a lot of their workplace even...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96186440678 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76329345547 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466101694915 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2544713497 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5833333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2803757334 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840408727888 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576758363034 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18517945833 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170114381509 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.