TPO 29- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is an important part of our lives. It is vital because people needs good education for them to succeed in their future career. Most people believe that to improve the quality of education, universities should allocate their budget on increasing the salary of the professor. In my humble opinion, I think it is irrelevant that universities spends their funding on increasing the monthly salary of teachers. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore on the following essay.
First of all, education and teachers are integral part in molding the young minds of our generation today. Teachers roles are to influence, guide and share their knowledge to their students. In addition, they prepare students to become well prepared on the real world. By studying in universities students will gain ample learning in their courses and can excel better in their future career. But I think it is not enough that universities spends their budget in increasing the salary of the professors because it is their job to teach their students and the nature of their works needs to focus on the well being of their pupils. Also there are more useful resources that needs to be allocated with funds in order to improve the quality of education of students.
Secondly, quality of education can be greatly enhance with purchasing additional teaching materials and new reading materials for the professor to use, so that they can be updated with the latest teaching styles used today. Also, the campus should fund the library with new resources because the library are the last pillar of the school which are being updated. If new books and reference materials are available, then students will be flocking the library and study there. As a result, students will gain additional information and they will be enticed to build a strong study habits for themselves due to they can see other students reading and studying there. Funds should be also allocated to classrooms like building a good lightning source for the students. For example, in our school in elementary the lighting is so poor that students gets sleepy easily because it is so dim and conducive to sleeping. I believe if funds are allocated wisely then students will be more interested to enhance their learning and knowledge in their academic subjects.
To summarize, I believe that the funding of the school should be spend in the library and lighting of classroom. This is because additional books and good lightning encourages students to learn more, thus their quality of education will be widen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ocus on the well being of their pupils. Also there are more useful resources that ne...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...hat the funding of the school should be spend in the library and lighting of classroo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, i feel, i think, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01165501166 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60664641826 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431235431235 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1272966908 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988396128003 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385992715666 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532364777785 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793069639865 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456098296075 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.