Tpo 29, to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
class="some">some people may class="think">think class="that">that class="if">if universities class="spend">spend more money on salaries for professors, the quality of class="student">student's education class="should">should improve. however, in my opinion, I disagree with this point. Accordingly, I provided two reasons to explain class="it">it.
First, I class="think">think the quality of education does not class="depend">depend on the professors' salaries; class="instead">instead, class="it">it class="is">is all class="about">about students themselves. The quality of education students receive class="is">is affected by students' personalities and individual characteristics. For example, a self-disciplined and aggressive class="student">student class="is">is usually more willing to ask professors questions class="if">if they class="get">get confused in class. however, a lazy class="student">student who does not care class="about">about studies usually put less effort in class, so the quality of education they receive class="is">is always low and inefficient. To be more specific, I class="think">think the quality of education will not make a great improvement class="if">if universities spent more money on professors' salaries.
Second, to improve the quality of education, universities class="should">should class="spend">spend more money on other things, for example, the laboratory equipment. class="if">if a university has more high-level and advanced equipment, students can learn knowledge by actually practicing the steps. Take filming courses as an example, class="if">if students can really operate the cameras and recorders class="that">that are used by workers in film industries, they can class="get">get more familiar with the filming process and experience the actual daily lives of their future jobs. therefore, I disagree class="that">that universities class="should">should class="spend">spend more money on salaries; class="instead">instead, universities class="should">should class="spend">spend money on other things class="that">that benefit students' education.
To sum up, although class="some">some people may suggest class="that">that spending money on salaries for professors makes teachers more willing to provide better teaching qualities of their courses. however, I class="think">think the quality of education depends more on students' themselves; also, money class="should">should be used on something beneficial to students. therefore, to improve the quality of education, I refute class="that">that universities class="spend">spend more money on professors' salaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
class='some'>some people may c...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
class='some'>some people may class=...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s='should'>should improve. however, in my opinion, I disagree with this po...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xplain class='it'>it. First, I class='think'>thin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'classes'?
Suggestion: classes
...>instead, class='it'>it class='is'>is all class='ab...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 671, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...pos;get'>get confused in class. however, a lazy class='student'>st...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more money on professors salaries. Second, to improve the quality of educat...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
... for example, the laboratory equipment. class='if'>if a university has m...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 671, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ctual daily lives of their future jobs. therefore, I disagree class='that'>t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t;that benefit students education. To sum up, although class='some&apo...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...er teaching qualities of their courses. however, I class='think'>think the...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 430, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ed on something beneficial to students. therefore, to improve the quality of education, I...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2871.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 9.11428571429 4.8611393121 187% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.17016754422 2.67179642975 343% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492063492063 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.5 1.51630824373 165% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0296073066 48.9658058833 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.4 100.406767564 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115243883882 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885752017478 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088351204475 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118493989611 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559110884808 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.0 11.7677419355 272% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -25.98 58.1214874552 -45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.10430107527 239% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.1 10.1575268817 218% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 35.56 10.9000537634 326% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.