Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all other approaches for improvement of education quality, I firmly concur with the idea that allocating more money to professors is a sensible suggestion. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that if professors are not paid sufficiently they will be reluctant to work efficiently in their positions. They allocate a considerable part of their time to a second and third job. Provided that they are paid according to their efforts, they will be willing to enhance their yield. To illustrate, one needs only to refer to numerous professors who due to their low salaries do not focus on their works adequately. To demonstrate, most of the scientists all over the world contend that there is a direct link between professors’ salary and their teaching quality. So they established an experimental program worldwide to estimate the effectiveness of professors' income on learning efficiency of students. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of professors not paid well, their students have lower grade compared to professors paid enough.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another subtle point meticulously that if they cannot meet their families' needs they will be under pressure so that they cannot concentrate on teaching. As a matter of fact, financial problems influence on their teaching quality adversely. Most of the time, they are worry about their personal problems with which they are struggling. The modern world offer abundant examples of professors whose financial problems do not let them to do their best. a noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that as long as professors do not meet their minimum requirements of their lives, they cannot be productive in classes.
Having well paid occupations is vital to everyone to survive in today's tough life. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about the amount of salary should be paid to professors to be productive. By increasing their income, university staff not only prevent from their working in some other businesses but also help them to enhance their efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a due'.
Suggestion: who is a due
...ds only to refer to numerous professors who due to their low salaries do not focus on t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: I_AM_WORRY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worried'?
Suggestion: worried
...y adversely. Most of the time, they are worry about their personal problems with whic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...blems do not let them to do their best. a noteworthy refreshingly intelligible st...
^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that as long as pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uirements of their lives, they cannot be productive in classes. Having well pai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, third, well, apart from, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35106382979 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01199127557 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561170212766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3894823163 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.352941176 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0660888462394 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258784733652 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223735882293 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515735461474 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173810290315 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.