Universities have a limited amount of budget that they should make a decision on how to spend it. There are a variety of areas in which each of them is very important for improving the quality of education. There are debates that spending money on salaries university professors will cause improving the quality of education. While some may think spending money on salaries university professors is not important, I believe that by doing so, the quality of education will improve efficiently for the following reasons.
Firstly, professors will have more concentration on education. It is obvious, one thing which causes stress and worries in human life is earning money. Paying the bills, buying a house and other things that need money are important for us and if we can not do that completely, we will have a stress and anxiety, when there are fewer worries about money, the concentration of professors will be increased and they will pay more attention to their jobs. They will focus on providing complete lecture for their classes. For instance, one of my teachers in universities had many problems in his financial life. He had to work a lot and he had some private classes too. Always he was worried about how to afford paying bills. Furthermore, professors become more motivated, more satisfied and more active and tend to have a more attention to their job.
Second, when professors get more money, they can improve their knowledge efficiently. They can have a trip to other countries and universities and get some new knowledge. They can spend money on incorporating some sessions. Also, they can buy some new facilities which use for developing their knowledge. For instance, my chemistry teacher has had a private lab for himself in their home where his experiments were done. He sometimes asks their students to use this lab for their experiments.
To sum up, In my opinion, expend money for salaries university professors is beneficial. The quality of education will arise because they have fewer worries about earning money and they can afford the investment of developing their knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...here are debates that spending money on salaries university professors will cause improv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
... While some may think spending money on salaries university professors is not important,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 665, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...ot and he had some private classes too. Always he was worried about how to afford payi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 707, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to pay'.
Suggestion: to pay
...ways he was worried about how to afford paying bills. Furthermore, professors become m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to use this lab for their experiments. To sum up, In my opinion, expend money f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04584527221 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7885442171 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47564469914 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0507805476 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.05 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155007409278 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640986166674 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736054872041 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129351945116 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102009849496 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.