The reading states that many critics would like to stop buzzing which is a new tactic for advertisements and provide three reasons for supports. The lecturer, who is a buzzer, says buzzing is a good way for advertising and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading states that buzzers who get paid, will give wrong information about products and customers cannot trust them. However, the lecturer refutes this claim and says advertising companies select persons who use that product and they think that product is useful. So, they will give the correct information even they get paid.
Second, the reading posits that customers listen to the buzzers less critically. Because they think buzzers are individual. But, the lecturer refutes this claim by explaining that according to his experience people ask a lot of question about that product like how long did he use that product, How much is cost and so on. If they can not answer well, customers do not trust them.
Third, the reading states that buzzing has a bad influence on social relationship. However, the lecturer refutes this claim by explaining that buzzers used these products. Therefore, they will introduce the product base of their real experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... listen to the buzzers less critically. Because they think buzzers are individual. But,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 202.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14356435644 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62962636325 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7837964701 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351949544809 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131293820036 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507050604322 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21277448165 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465590654565 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.